Note: Check out this article on how I think that draft picks
should be valued to see the methodology behind my approach.
Drafts Ten through
Six can be found here.
Number 5: 2005 New
England Patriots – 4.9% Surplus[1]
Player
|
Pos
|
Pick
|
Avg. Value per Season
|
Avg Pick AV/S
|
Surplus
|
Logan Mankins
|
G
|
32
|
3.4%
|
2.1%
|
1.3%
|
Ellis Hobbs
|
DB
|
84
|
1.7%
|
1.4%
|
0.4%
|
Nick Kaczur
|
T
|
100
|
3.0%
|
1.2%
|
1.8%
|
James Sanders
|
DB
|
133
|
1.0%
|
1.1%
|
-0.1%
|
Ryan Claridge
|
LB
|
170
|
0.0%
|
1.0%
|
-1.0%
|
Matt Cassel
|
QB
|
230
|
4.4%
|
0.9%
|
3.4%
|
Andy Stokes
|
TE
|
255
|
0.0%
|
0.9%
|
-0.9%
|
Ok, ok, I know where everyone[2]
is looking first. Matt Cassel’s last couple of seasons have not been great, but
from 2008
to 2010 he gave every indication that he was going to develop into a
quality player. He obviously played very well in relief of Tom Brady after the
latter’s knee gave out under the weight of scandal (and a direct hit from a
helmet). Now forgotten is that he made the 2010 Pro Bowl on the merits of a
very strong season (3116 yards, 58% completion, 27 TDs, 7 INTs, 93.0 QB rating).
Regardless of how bad he appears to be right now, getting three competent (and
a few less so) seasons at the most important position on the field is a very
favorable outcome for the 230th pick.
Outside of the Cassel situation, offensive linemen Logan Mankins
and Nick Kaczur drove this class to its lofty ranking. Kaczur may not be the
name that Mankins is and definitely would be hurt if we looked at total value
(as opposed to AV/S – Mankins has 24% and Kaczur 15% as of the end of the 2011
season), but he started 62 games over 5 seasons at tackle.
What is really remarkable about this draft is that the
Patriots held very few top picks. Compared to the others on this list they came
into the draft with a significantly lower “top” pick. All of the other teams
held the #11 or better while the Patriots best pick was the last of the first
round.
Number 4: 1996
Baltimore Ravens – 5.5% Surplus
Player
|
Pos
|
Pick
|
Avg. Value per Season
|
Avg Pick AV/S
|
Surplus
|
Jonathan Ogden
|
T
|
4
|
7.1%
|
3.6%
|
3.6%
|
Ray Lewis
|
LB
|
26
|
5.3%
|
2.2%
|
3.1%
|
DeRon Jenkins
|
DB
|
55
|
1.4%
|
1.7%
|
-0.3%
|
Jermaine Lewis
|
WR
|
153
|
2.1%
|
1.1%
|
1.1%
|
Dexter Daniels
|
LB
|
172
|
0.4%
|
1.0%
|
-0.6%
|
James Roe
|
WR
|
186
|
0.5%
|
1.0%
|
-0.5%
|
Jon Stark
|
QB
|
238
|
0.0%
|
0.9%
|
-0.9%
|
Nothing fancy about this. The Ravens hit the ball out of
the park on both of their first round picks and ensured that the franchise
would be on a very different trajectory in Baltimore than it was in Cleveland.
I can’t say anything more without getting extremely negative so I will just
move on.
Number 3: 2004 San
Diego Chargers – 5.7% Surplus
Player
|
Pos
|
Pick
|
Avg. Value per Season
|
Avg Pick AV/S
|
Surplus
|
Eli
Manning
|
QB
|
1
|
5.7%
|
4.6%
|
1.1%
|
Igor
Olshansky
|
DE
|
35
|
3.2%
|
2.0%
|
1.2%
|
Nate
Kaeding
|
PK
|
65
|
1.0%
|
1.6%
|
-0.6%
|
Nick
Hardwick
|
C
|
66
|
2.1%
|
1.5%
|
0.5%
|
Shaun
Phillips
|
DE
|
98
|
3.3%
|
1.3%
|
2.1%
|
Dave
Ball
|
DE
|
133
|
1.0%
|
1.1%
|
-0.1%
|
Michael
Turner
|
RB
|
154
|
2.3%
|
1.1%
|
1.3%
|
Ryan
Krause
|
TE
|
169
|
0.5%
|
1.0%
|
-0.5%
|
Ryon
Bingham
|
DT
|
204
|
0.4%
|
1.0%
|
-0.6%
|
Shane
Olivea
|
T
|
209
|
3.0%
|
1.0%
|
2.1%
|
Carlos
Joseph
|
T
|
254
|
0.0%
|
0.9%
|
-0.9%
|
Well this is awkward. These are the weaknesses of running
a system with players ranked solely based on who drafted them, special cases
tend to cause problems. If we reallocate the players based on draft day trades,
the Chargers lose Manning (1.1% surplus) and gain Philip Rivers (3.0% surplus)
so they would actually check in with a 7.6% surplus and come in first overall.
Those are the breaks.
As it was the Chargers still laid the foundation for
their late 2000s run of success with Rivers, Shaun Phillips, Igor Olshansky,
Shane Olivea and Michael Turner all playing major roles – as well as Shawne
Merriman, who arrived in 2005 as an additional pick included in the Eli Manning
trade.
Number 2: 2006
Denver Broncos – 6.4% Surplus
Player
|
Pos
|
Pick
|
Avg. Value per Season
|
Avg Pick AV/S
|
Surplus
|
Jay
Cutler
|
QB
|
11
|
5.7%
|
2.8%
|
2.9%
|
Tony
Scheffler
|
TE
|
61
|
0.8%
|
1.6%
|
-0.8%
|
Brandon
Marshall
|
WR
|
119
|
3.8%
|
1.1%
|
2.7%
|
Elvis
Dumervil
|
DE
|
126
|
3.8%
|
1.1%
|
2.7%
|
Domenik
Hixon
|
WR
|
130
|
0.5%
|
1.1%
|
-0.6%
|
Chris
Kuper
|
G
|
161
|
1.6%
|
1.0%
|
0.5%
|
Greg
Eslinger
|
C
|
198
|
0.0%
|
1.0%
|
-1.0%
|
While lacking the breadth of the Chargers’ haul in third
place, the Broncos put together a very strong class on the backs of three elite
players. Jay Cutler, Brandon Marshall and Elvis Dumervil provided all the
surplus value needed to push this draft to number two overall.
Number 1: 2005 Dallas
Cowboys – 7.3% Surplus
Player
|
Pos
|
Pick
|
Avg. Value per Season
|
Avg Pick AV/S
|
Surplus
|
DeMarcus
Ware
|
LB
|
11
|
5.7%
|
2.8%
|
2.8%
|
Marcus
R. Spears
|
DE
|
20
|
2.7%
|
2.4%
|
0.3%
|
Kevin
Burnett
|
LB
|
42
|
0.9%
|
1.9%
|
-0.9%
|
Marion
Barber
|
RB
|
109
|
1.7%
|
1.2%
|
0.5%
|
Chris
L. Canty
|
DE
|
132
|
2.7%
|
1.1%
|
1.6%
|
Justin
Beriault
|
DB
|
208
|
0.0%
|
1.0%
|
-1.0%
|
Rob
Petitti
|
T
|
209
|
0.9%
|
1.0%
|
-0.1%
|
Jay
Ratliff
|
DE
|
224
|
4.9%
|
0.9%
|
3.9%
|
The Cowboys managed to hit home runs on their first and
last picks in this draft, with solid picks through the middle to not give back
that value. Ware is one of the top 30 players in overall value per season while
Jay Ratliff has the 13th highest individual surplus in the Salary Cap
era. Bill Parcells ensured with this draft that he would leave Dallas better
than he found it when he departed after the 2006 season.
[1]
Surplus here represents surplus value per player per season. If the draft class
contained two players who each played two seasons and one player who played a
single season for five total seasons played, we would expect the total surplus
to be 5x the number quoted here.
[2] I
also realize that “everyone” is comprised of approximately 13 pageviews from me
and one random one from Russia.
No comments:
Post a Comment